Responses

Download PDFPDF

Perfect storm: emotionally based school avoidance in the post-COVID-19 pandemic context
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

  • Published on:
    Letter to the Editor: "Perfect storm: emotionally based school avoidance in the post-COVID-19 pandemic context"

    Dear Editor,

    I eagerly write in response to the perspective piece entitled “Perfect storm: emotionally based school avoidance in the post-COVID-19 pandemic context.”1 The authors provide a timely and crucial analysis of the rising trend in emotionally based school avoidance (EBSA) following the COVID-19 pandemic. However, while their overview of the issue and proposed interventions are commendable, I believe there are several critical points that warrant further inquiry and discussion.

    The authors rightly identify the complex array of factors contributing to EBSA, including school, family, and child-based risk factors. However, their analysis would benefit from a more nuanced investigation of the socioeconomic disparities exacerbated by the pandemic. Research has previously shown that children from lower-income families were disproportionately affected by school closures and faced greater challenges in accessing remote learning resources.2 Such a preexisting inequality may have further exacerbated EBSA patterns among vulnerable populations—this deserves greater emphasis in developing targeted interventions.

    The authors acknowledge the need for multi-component approaches across education, health, and social care sectors, and their call for early intervention that does not impose strict absenteeism criteria is laudable. My only worry is that this approach may present challenges in terms of resource allocation and identifying those most in need of support...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.