Article Text

Download PDFPDF

In children treated for internalising or externalising problems, sudden large improvements between sessions is associated with longer term outcomes
Free
  1. Idan M Aderka
  1. Department of Psychology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Question

Question: Among children and families treated for internalising and externalising problems within a randomised controlled trial (RCT) are sudden gains (rapid, sizeable changes between treatment sessions) associated with participant characteristics and longer term outcomes?

Participants: 161 children (aged 7–13 years; 70% male; 50% minority ethnic status) with anxiety, depression or conduct-disruptive disorders and their caregivers, who were participating in a multicentre RCT of three treatment modalities for internalising and externalising problems. Children and caregivers had initially sought outpatient treatment for the disorders and diagnoses confirming eligibility for the trial were made using the Children's Interview for Psychiatric Syndromes.

Setting: Community clinics, Massachusetts and Hawaii, USA.

Intervention: Modular treatment or standard manual treatment (not further described) compared with usual care. The therapist-completed consultation record was used to assess session content, which was broadly categorised into cognitive or behavioural content.

Outcomes: Internalising and externalising symptoms. The parent-reported and child-reported Brief Problem Checklist (BPC) were administered every 3 months during the first 18 months of the trial, which rates items from 0 (not true) to 2 (very true) with higher scores indicating greater symptom burden. Weekly phone calls in between sessions assessed past-week severity of the top three problems (identified at baseline using the Top Problems Assessment, TPA) on a scale from 0 (not a problem) to 10 (very, very much a problem). The Child Behaviour Checklist (parent report) and Youth Self-Report (child report) were used to assess symptoms at baseline, post-treatment and final assessments. Averages of each quarterly and weekly score were used to identify large sudden gains (SG). Linear regression models were used to examine associations between SG and final assessment scores and other participant and treatment characteristics.

Patient follow-up: Initial trial recruitment was 203 and 174 received treatment. Analysis was performed for the 161 children (80.5%) who had complete assessment data.

Methods

Design: Randomised controlled trial.

Allocation: Unclear.

Blinding: Unclear.

Follow-up period: Total trial duration not reported.

Main results

A total of 2946 sessions were assessed for SG. On the quarterly BPC, 1% of assessments were associated with SG, and 20% of participants had SG at some point during treatment. On the past-week TPA, 2% of assessments were associated with SG, and 33% of participants had SG at some point during treatment. The average size of SG was 0.64 points on BPC (3% of total score) and 3.75 on TPA (13% of total score). The median session associated with SG was sessions 4 for TPA and 5 for BPC. Presence of SG by parent or child report on either BPC or TPA was associated with improvement in overall symptoms at final assessment after controlling for baseline severity of scores and overall magnitude of pretreatment to post-treatment change (p<0.01). In children with depression and/or anxiety SG on BPC was not significantly associated with final assessment of parent-reported or child-reported internalising symptoms. In children with conduct disorder SG on BPC was associated with improvement in externalising symptoms, even after adjusting for baseline severity of scores and overall magnitude of pretreatment to post-treatment change (p<0.01). Early SG was not associated with overall, internalising or externalising symptoms. SG was not associated with gender, race, age, ethnicity, primary diagnosis, number of diagnoses, treatment modality or city. By content of modular and standard manual treatments, relaxation was more likely to be associated with SG than other session content.

Conclusions

Among children treated for internalising or externalising disorders within RCT, sudden, large gains in symptom scores between assessment sessions was associated with overall improved outcomes at final assessment.

Abstracted from

OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

Commentary

Dour and colleagues examine the phenomenon of sudden gains occurring among children receiving treatment for diverse externalising and internalising problems in a naturalistic setting. Sudden gains are defined as rapid decreases in symptoms that occur between consecutive treatment sessions. Sudden gains have been consistently shown to predict treatment outcome across diverse treatments, populations and disorders, thus establishing the phenomenon as an important predictor of treatment response.

Dour and colleagues make a significant contribution to the sudden gains literature. Theirs is the second study to examine sudden gains among children and the first to do so in a naturalistic setting while utilising parent as well as child reports. Moreover, the authors conduct a very rigorous test for predictive utility of sudden gains, examining their contribution above and beyond the change occurring in treatment. In other words, they examine whether the suddenness of gains is associated with better outcome. Their findings indicate that sudden gains can be identified among children in naturalistic settings and that overall, these gains predict treatment outcome when controlling the change occurring during treatment.

These results have important clinical implications. First, they suggest that despite common clinical intuition which suggests that change during treatment should be gradual in order to be consolidated and maintained over the long term, it is actually sudden change that is related to superior outcomes. Their results also suggest that similar processes of treatment change may occur during treatment of adults and children and in naturalistic settings as well as controlled ones. Finally, they suggest that when sudden gains occur in treatment, therapists should embrace the change and leverage it for further improvement, rather than dismiss it and treat it as transient.

Footnotes

  • Sources of funding The John D and Catherine T MacArthur Foundation.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.